Reflecting on a place locked away by a pandemic —and what tourism means for the region in the first place. Photos from February-March 2020.
Click on images to expand. Scroll to bottom for South Georgia photos.
I have struggled to express my feelings since I left the southern polar region in March, 2020.
My thoughts as I was leaving were all on the tourism industry and it’s rapid growth in the region. I was worried about an industry launching 30+ new purpose built ice class ships over the next couple years. Carrying an additional 100-500 people each, I wondered if they’d overrun the Antarctic Peninsula entirely (behind the scenes, scheduling is already a challenge for the 20-30 ships bringing 70,000+ people a year to Antarctica).
Antarctic Peninsula
I was also concerned by the industries growing environmental impact —especially when it’s touted as a brand of environmental tourism. The British Antarctic Survey estimates a trip to Antarctica for one person emits roughly the same amount of CO2 as the average British person emits at home over an entire year.
But I was most puzzled about the shifting attitude in environmental tourism.
Most people fit roughly into one of four categories for why they wanted to visit Antarctica. One: a lifelong dream —fair enough. Two: a friend had recommended it or inspiration had struck while watch BBC’s Planet Earth or March of the Penguins. Three: it was on a bucket list. Four: it’s just what you do, and after all, it would be the 7th continent visited that year, or in a lifetime.
To me, it feels like the latter two categories are becoming the dominant reasons for a visit to Antarctica. The hype machine is working, and the industry — an industry that is often the byproduct of well meaning conservation campaigns to save areas from resource exploration, development, hunting etc. — is booming.
What this means, as more people pursue environmental tourism, is that the industry is getting competitive. With so many operators, advertising shifts from the adventure to the amenities offered. And with increasing amenities, comes an increased environmental impact and experiential irrelevance. After all, why choose a company that asks passengers to share a cabin when another offers a king size bed, hot showers, skiing, saunas, kayaking, and champagne toasts from the hot tub on the top deck.
This competition feeds on itself as operators compete for dominance, or at least relevance. And with great profundity, environmental tourism consumers choose their experience based upon the size of the bed.
And all of this concerned me deeply.
But then, the pandemic shut it down.
For the 2020-21 season, the vast majority of the Antarctic tourism industry will be on pause.
So instead of kicking it when it’s down, I’ll leave it there. And leave you with a question, and an ask for the future.
Why do you want to go?
And, next time you go somewhere, choose to offset it. Or, even more bold, I dare you to give the same amount you spend on the trip to a local charity; your choice which one.